US and Iran begin peace talks in Islamabad after six-week war

ABC Australia emphasizes the high-stakes nature of the talks while highlighting military tensions that continue despite diplomatic efforts, including detailed coverage of US naval movements in the Strait of Hormuz. Their framing reflects Australia's position as a US ally concerned about regional stability affecting global trade routes.

Dawn prominently features Pakistan's mediating role and Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif's diplomatic engagement with both sides, positioning Islamabad as an essential peace broker. The outlet emphasizes Pakistan's constructive contribution to regional stability, reflecting the country's strategic interest in being seen as a responsible regional power.

The Hindu frames the talks through a regional stability lens, emphasizing Pakistan's role as mediator and the broader implications for South Asian security given India's complex relationships with both Iran and the US. Their coverage highlights the historic nature of direct US-Iran engagement while positioning India as a concerned observer of Middle Eastern conflicts that could affect regional energy security and strategic partnerships.

Reuters presents the talks as a pragmatic diplomatic breakthrough, emphasizing the unprecedented nature of direct US-Iran negotiations since 1979 without taking sides on the outcome. The framing reflects Saudi Arabia's complex position of wanting regional stability while maintaining concerns about Iranian influence, presenting the talks as potentially beneficial for Gulf security if they succeed in containing the conflict.

The New York Times emphasizes uncertainty and fragility around the peace process, highlighting doubts about the durability of any potential agreement. This framing reflects Turkey's position as a NATO ally with independent regional interests, viewing the talks as necessary but potentially unstable given the deep-rooted nature of US-Iran tensions and Turkey's own complex relationships with both powers.