President Donald Trump renewed his criticism of NATO following a closed-door White House meeting with Secretary-General Mark Rutte on Wednesday, declaring the alliance had failed to support the United States when needed most.

The two-hour meeting came amid escalating tensions between Washington and European allies over their response to Trump's military campaign against Iran. Several NATO members had restricted US use of their airspace and military bases during recent operations, prompting Trump to question America's commitment to the 75-year-old alliance.

NATO was not there when we needed them, and will not be there if we need them again

Donald Trump, US President — Truth Social

Rutte acknowledged after the meeting that Trump expressed clear disappointment with the alliance's performance during the Iran crisis. The NATO chief confirmed that some European nations had indeed failed to meet their commitments, though he maintained that the majority had provided logistical support as promised.

It is true that not all European nations fulfilled their commitments. I completely understand his disappointment!

Mark Rutte, NATO Secretary-General — CNN

The meeting occurred one day after Washington and Tehran agreed to a fragile two-week ceasefire that includes reopening the strategically vital Strait of Hormuz. Trump had previously threatened to target Iranian power plants and bridges, warning that an entire civilization could perish.

Prior to the White House talks, administration officials had indicated that a potential US withdrawal from NATO remained under discussion. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt suggested Trump would address the matter directly with Rutte during their meeting.

They were put to the test and they failed

Donald Trump, quoted by Karoline Leavitt — White House

Trump's frustration stems from what he views as European reluctance to support US operations in the Middle East. Several allies closed their airspace to American military aircraft and refused to allow strikes against Iran to be launched from bases on their territory. The president has previously characterized NATO as a "paper tiger" for its unwillingness to lead efforts securing the Hormuz shipping lane.

Congressional constraints complicate any potential withdrawal from the alliance. A 2023 law requires congressional approval for any president to exit NATO, making unilateral action unlikely. However, Trump could still significantly damage the alliance through other means, including relocating US troops from non-cooperative nations.

The Wall Street Journal reported that the administration is considering punitive measures against specific countries deemed insufficiently supportive during the Iran conflict. Such actions could involve closing American military bases and withdrawing thousands of stationed personnel from allied territories.

Rutte's diplomatic mission to Washington represents a critical test of his ability to manage Trump's grievances while preserving transatlantic unity. The former Dutch prime minister has positioned himself as someone capable of working with the unpredictable American leader, but Wednesday's aftermath suggests significant challenges remain.

◈ How the world sees it9 perspectives
Mostly Analytical3 Critical6 Analytical
🇫🇷France
France 24
Critical

Frames Trump's NATO threats as destabilizing to European security architecture, emphasizing the alliance's historical importance and portraying Trump's demands as unreasonable. Highlights European concerns about American reliability and the potential consequences of transatlantic discord for global stability.

🇹🇷Turkey
Daily Sabah
Analytical

Presents the meeting as a diplomatic necessity while noting congressional constraints on NATO withdrawal. Emphasizes Turkey's position as a NATO member that has historically balanced relationships with both Washington and regional powers, framing the tensions as manageable through dialogue.

🇪🇸Spain
El País
Critical

Focuses on Trump's continued hostility toward multilateral institutions and European sovereignty concerns, particularly regarding Greenland references. Portrays the crisis as symptomatic of broader American unilateralism that threatens established international order and European strategic autonomy.

🇩🇪Germany
Spiegel Online